From payload to performance: robotic camera integration in broadcast studios

The trend towards automation in the broadcast industry has resulted in robotic camera systems becoming a central component of the construction and refurbishment of new studios.

While these advanced systems offer control and creativity, their integration presents technical challenges. Broadcasters must now balance the potential of robotics with the realities of implementation in studio production environments.

Industry experts from robotic camera system providers highlight the complexity of implementing these advanced systems and offer insights into best practices.

Payload management

One of the biggest challenges in implementing robotic camera systems is managing the payload. Karen Walker, Vice President of Camera Motion Systems at Ross Video, explains, “The biggest challenge is managing the payload of the robotic system, including the camera, lens, prompter and talent monitor.”

Walker notes that evolving camera technology adds to this complexity. “Camera bodies are getting smaller and smaller, and many clients are looking for a shallow depth of field with traditional cinema cameras in studio environments. Combining these cameras with ENG or cinema lenses can be difficult,” she notes.

This balance is key to maintaining fluid motion and precise control, especially when capturing dynamic shots or integrating into virtual sets and augmented reality workflows.

Safety protocols and training

When implementing robotic camera systems in broadcast environments, safety is a critical consideration as the operator is often not in the same room as the camera systems.

Paddy Taylor, Head of Broadcast Solutions at MRMC, stressed the importance of comprehensive security measures.

“Safety is critical. Ensure safety protocols are effectively documented, require training for everyone who works near a robotic system, and budget for appropriate safety hardware,” Taylor advised.

This focus on safety extends beyond the immediate operators to include all personnel who interact with or work in proximity to the robotic systems. Implementing robust safety protocols helps reduce the risks associated with moving mechanical components in a busy studio environment.

The introduction of robotic camera systems requires new skills from operators. Michael Cuomo, vice president at Telemetrics, noted the role change: “Camera robotics allows production teams to move personnel who perform more mundane tasks into more creative roles.”

However, Taylor pointed to a current skills gap in the industry. “There is a lack of knowledge and experience in this area and it is vital that the camera operators of the future have access to training to acquire the skills required,” he said.

This transition requires broadcasters to invest in training programs to ensure that operators can effectively control robotic systems and exploit their full potential.

Integration with existing systems

When implementing robotic camera systems, they often need to be integrated into the existing broadcast infrastructure. James Eddershaw, Managing Director of Shotoku, stressed the importance of flexibility in this integration.

“Many productions use robotic cameras primarily, but there is still the option to use a manual camera at the same time or on special productions. The decision to use robots should not be a one-off. Good robots allow full manual override without affecting operation in manual mode,” explained Eddershaw.

This flexibility allows broadcasters to gradually move to robotic systems while retaining the option of manual operation when needed.

Implementing robotic camera systems in existing broadcast studios presents challenges that go beyond the core technical and operational issues. Studio design must evolve to accommodate these systems, taking into account different floor coverings, multi-story floor plans and the integration of track or ceiling mounted cameras. This evolution requires a balance between creating visually appealing sets and ensuring functional spaces for robotic operations.

The overall size of studios is also becoming smaller, requiring more compact setups for cameras and robots.

Concerns about performance and reliability

The reliance on robotic systems brings new considerations regarding power management and system reliability. Walker addresses a common problem: “Power outages are a common problem. Manual control allows some movement in such cases, but powering the camera and teleprompters remains a problem.”

To mitigate these risks, broadcasters must implement robust emergency power systems and contingency plans to ensure continuity of operations in the event of technical problems.

As robotic camera technology continues to evolve, broadcasters need to prepare for future developments. Neil Gardner, senior product manager for robotics at Vinten, predicts greater integration of new technologies.

“AI and machine learning will take robotic cameras and automation to the next level. A natural look at camera movement and framing is key, and that comes with experience,” Gardner said.

This development may bring new technical challenges and requires broadcasters to continually update their systems and training protocols.

By proactively addressing these challenges, broadcasters can maximize the benefits of robotic camera systems while minimizing operational disruption. With careful planning, comprehensive training, and a focus on flexibility and safety, these systems can improve production capabilities and efficiency in broadcast studios.