close
close
A closer look at 10 analyst recommendations for Monolithic Power Systems – Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR)

Over the past three months, 10 analysts have shared their insights on monolithic power systems MPWRand expresses a range of opinions from optimistic to pessimistic.

The table below provides a quick overview of their recent ratings, highlighting the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the previous months.

Bullish Somewhat optimistic Indifferent A bit bearish Bearish
Overall Ratings 6 4 0 0 0
Last 30 days 1 0 0 0 0
1M ago 5 2 0 0 0
2 months ago 0 1 0 0 0
3 months ago 0 1 0 0 0

To gain deeper insights, analysts have set 12-month price targets indicating an average target of $955.3, a high estimate of $1100.00, and a low estimate of $880.00. This uptrend is evident, with the current average representing a 15.11% increase from the previous average price target of $829.90.

Price target chart

Diving into Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Investigation

A clear picture of how financial professionals perceive Monolithic Power Systems is obtained by thoroughly analyzing recent analyst activity. The following summary provides an overview of the key analysts, their recent reviews, and any adjustments to their ratings and price targets.

analyst Analyst firm Action taken Reviews Current price target Previous price target
Matt Ramsay TD Cowen Increases Buy 1100.00 USD $925.00
Quinn Bolton Needham Increases Buy 1000.00 USD 800.00 USD
Hans Mosesmann rose petal Maintains Buy $880.00 $880.00
Ross Seymore Deutsche Bank Increases Buy 900.00 USD 750.00 USD
Melissa Fairbanks Raymond James Increases Exceed $925.00 $770.00
John Vinh Keybanc Increases Obesity 1075,00 € $975.00
William Stone Trust securities Increases Buy 918,00 € 799,00 €
Hans Mosesmann rose petal Increases Buy $880.00 800.00 USD
John Vinh Keybanc Increases Obesity $975.00 $850.00
Rick Schafer Oppenheimer Increases Exceed 900.00 USD 750.00 USD

Key findings:

  • Action taken: Analysts adjust their recommendations based on changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they “maintain,” “increase,” or “decrease” their rating reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Monolithic Power Systems. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.
  • Evaluation: To provide insight into forecasts, analysts assign qualitative scores ranging from “outperform” to “underperform.” These ratings convey expectations about Monolithic Power Systems’ relative performance compared to the overall market.
  • Price targets: Analysts set price targets as an estimate of a stock’s future value. Comparing current and past price targets provides insight into how analysts’ expectations have changed over time. This information can be valuable to investors who want to understand consensus opinions about the stock’s potential future performance.

Reviewing these analyst ratings along with other financial indicators can help in getting a comprehensive understanding of Monolithic Power Systems’ market position. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with our ratings table.

Stay up to date with Monolithic Power Systems analyst ratings.

Discovering Monolithic Energy Systems: A Closer Look

Monolithic Power Systems is an analog and mixed-signal chip manufacturer specializing in power management solutions. The company’s mission is to reduce overall power consumption in end systems, and it serves the computer, automotive, industrial, communications, and consumer end markets. MPS uses a fabless manufacturing model and partners with third-party chip foundries to deliver its proprietary BCD process technology.

Analysis of Monolithic Power Systems’ financial performance

Market capitalization perspectives: The company’s market capitalization is below the industry average, indicating a relatively small size compared to peers. This positioning can be influenced by factors such as perceived growth potential or operating size.

Sales growth: Monolithic Power Systems’ remarkable performance in 3 months is evident. As of June 30, 2024, the company achieved an impressive revenue growth rate of 15.03%. This represents a significant increase in the company’s revenue. Compared to its competitors, the revenue growth lags behind that of its industry peers. The company achieved a growth rate that was below the average of its competitors in the information technology sector.

Net margin: The company’s net margin is outstanding and above the industry average. With an impressive net margin of 19.78%, The company has high profitability and effective cost control.

Return on equity (ROE): The company’s return on equity is outstanding and above the industry average. With an impressive return on equity of 4.66%, The company demonstrates effective use of equity.

Return on assets (ROA): Monolithic Power Systems’ financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROA, which exceeds the industry average. With a remarkable ROA of 3.84%, The company is characterized by efficient use of its assets and strong financial health.

Debt management: Monolithic Power Systems’ debt ratio is below the industry average and indicates a solid financial structure with a ratio of 0.01.

Understanding the relevance of analyst ratings

Benzinga tracks 150 analyst firms and reports on their stock expectations. Analysts typically reach their conclusions by predicting how much money a company will make in the future, usually over the next five years, and how risky or predictable that company’s revenue streams are.

Analysts attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to provide their ratings on stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once a quarter or whenever the company issues a major update.

In addition to their standard ratings, some analysts provide forecasts for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings and revenue, providing additional guidance to investors. Users of analyst ratings should be aware that this specialized advice is influenced by human perspectives and can be subject to fluctuations.

This article was generated by Benzinga’s automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Market news and data provided by Benzinga APIs

By Bronte

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *